What about the old one?
It was good, but before their new source engine, they had a different logo.
0 reviews are hidden due to your filters.
What about the old one?
It was good, but before their new source engine, they had a different logo.
That is another long a interesting tale that has yet to be told.
*wind howl*
Meh...
Could've been way better. Your animation style isn't very good, you used the same sound for all the dropping sounds, and you could've added at least a little background music in the parts. The voices also could've been a little bit clearer. Is it your mic? Well it doesn't matter, front page material always should cal for the best.
4/10
2/5
Background music crossed my mind, but I think it would have been too distracting in some scenes! I think what caused unclearness was the fact that I, 1, recorded the voices during a party, so I had to edit out background noise, but it doesn't work too well while a person is talking, and 2, I lowered the sound quality somewhat so that the animation lags less behind the sound on slower machines. My animation style, that can only improve through practice =/.
fucking terrible..
The animation was sloppy, the framerate was low, it didn't make any sense, the sound quality was like it was a recording from the 70s, the music didn't blend in with the animation, this was terrible. Just terrible.
What does frame rate have to do with good animation.
I put it at standard 24 fps.
I will say the animation was sloppy though, but I rushed it because it was due the next day.
Meh...
It was ayt. Definitely not front page worthy though.
You're an asshole. AN AASSSHOOLLEE.
Great potential
I see you doing great things in the future. Just fix the sound quality (File>Publish Settings> Flash Tab) and set the sound settings to the highest. I'll see where you take this, but just cause I feel like raising your score, i'll give you a 5.
Thanks. :D
Suck my cock.
Age 32, Male
Amsterdam; Smoking up.
Joined on 8/22/07